Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,269

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

 Content Type 

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. forlanssister
    Yes but there will probably be at least double the amount of shares in issue by the end of the year I honestly doubt they'll be able to maintain their holdings.
  2. forlanssister
    I would be given that either there's a couple of dilutive shares issues on the way or we're f*&ked. I'm not convinced that they can gain a meaningful holding within a plc structure I believe it would easier with a private company.
  3. forlanssister
    They wouldn't have bought them above the 20p they've already paid as it would complicate matters. However people of a similar mindset may have.
  4. forlanssister
    You seriously think they would trust a word that comes out of any of the Easdales mouths?
  5. forlanssister
    Why would the 3B's support this Board?
  6. forlanssister
    The Record Article:
  7. forlanssister
    Well I suppose you can argue the pleas for transparency have been answered as you can see right through today's f*&king statements!
  8. forlanssister
    ...and his next tweet is:
  9. forlanssister
    Gibbons won't be writing anything!
  10. forlanssister
    But only one of them's done porridge iirc (well so far anyway!).
  11. forlanssister
    Quite amusing the ease with how that was achieved.
  12. forlanssister
    The Shadow Director?
  13. forlanssister
    This is where a half decent NOMAD would come into play unfortunately we don't have one of those we have Paul Shackleton.
  14. forlanssister
    Not sure if it actually needs 75% if there is no dis-application of preemption rights involved.
  15. forlanssister
    More than Derek Llambias and Barry Leach.
  16. forlanssister
    Posted this earlier in the wrong thread! http://au.eurosport.com/football/thr...26/story.shtml
  17. forlanssister
    http://au.eurosport.com/football/three-bears-keen-to-protect-ibrox_sto4548226/story.shtml
  18. forlanssister
  19. forlanssister
    Fair point .
  20. forlanssister
    No it doesn't. It means there's a protocol in place so that the 12 RFB members don't issue 12 different statements.
  21. forlanssister
    You know full well there's a protocol to follow.
  22. forlanssister
    I concur. Could this thread be split from the top of the page, so it can be discussed on it's own merits pertinent to the proposed security/loan?
  23. forlanssister
    Absolutely nothing.
  24. forlanssister
    As I said don't shoot the messenger. As soon as I'm aware of more information I'll post it.
  25. forlanssister
    Don't shoot the messenger.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.