Jump to content

 

 

Stimpy

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,531

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Stimpy

  1. Stimpy
    Belter. I might have to buy this and give ****s some money.
  2. Stimpy
    Short snippet at the bottom of the article on Scottish Football however it is the part where each televised league game generates £6.5m in revenue for clubs. We bemoan the standards set by Ally, the lack of youth and no scouts, but competiting with EPL relegation fodder for players is our best hope outside of unearthing gems and eventually setting up an effective scouting network. The club needs to seriously up its game. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-27667472 Staggering figures for a nation that has only won one major tournament nearly 50 years ago.
  3. Stimpy
    Agreed. I also don't think we've got the same level of player in the youths and certainly don't have the cash to buy decent. An effective short term fix.
  4. Stimpy
    Lifted from their page: I am still of the opinion that we will NOT go in to admin and that Laxey will give us another loan but this time against Auchenhowie training centre. I have, since Friday, been hearing the same rumours that others have been no doubt hearing and I will be investigating them this week. Some reliable sources say we will be in admin before season starts in a way to get high earners off wage bill and others claim the training ground will be getting sold outright before this happens. Both of these rumours are a concern due to the quality of sources and I shall seek to prove them right or wrong. Anyone with info regarding these rumours please feel free to contact me confidentially via personal message
  5. Stimpy

    Mols or Negri?

    Stimpy replied to Scott7's topic in Rangers Chat

    Ralph Brand.
  6. Stimpy
    Exactly how I see it and have been saying for sometime to friends unless King buys the club and then looks to get investment in.
  7. Stimpy
    Well, we now for absolute certain how professional his blog his.
  8. Stimpy
    Yup, or an extreme split personality. Two things made very clear on the website are now an issue!
  9. Stimpy
    No issue with people trying but asking grown men to agree to a code of conduct on the internet is perhaps one of the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. No one is tolerating bullies. Indeed, I am seeing more and more people stand up which is heartening. The club don't tolerate it either, they encourage it as anti-sociable behaviour amongst the support suits them. I used to moderate the RST social media accounts whioch gave me an insight into how a tiny minority act. When we into admin the comments and campaigns that followed were the lowest I've been with supporters. I took a step back from forums and social media for a wee while and realised it was a tiny minority who love nothing more than agro. I never once pandered to them and don't intend to now. By default the idea is giving credence to a small minority of people whose aim is agro some sort of importance. The club needs sorted first and the large body of fans disengaged with groups, campaigns and the club itself need addressed as a priority. Edit: As I've said previously, arseholse don't stop being arseholes. That's who they are and folk should move on without them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. Stimpy
    You should have read the website where it clearly states 28 days delivery.
  11. Stimpy
    You're on the wrong forum talking to the wrong person on your aims with this. All this crap (online) will end when the club is run by credible owners who embrace supporters and their needs and wants. You've got to remember the club actively participate in divide and conquer tactics and the fans liaison is as guilty as Jack Irvine. The lead will come from the club in a few years time. Vanity projects are worthless whilst hedge funds piss all over us.
  12. Stimpy
    Sly dig from the man promoting a code of conduct. Lol.
  13. Stimpy
    They got quite a lot stick for this so I'd guess they're not going to report on the meeting?
  14. Stimpy
    Never gonna happen. Naive to think people who've spent all their internet Rangers time smearing, lying and attempting to bully will suddenly act civil.
  15. Stimpy
    Which leads me to my earlier point: forums aren't accountable to anyone and that's why the choice is there, as forums don't represent the posters on the sites. The RST going for example will be supported (I presume) by most members whereas I'm against it. Therefore it is right the RST are represented regardless of my personal opinion.
  16. Stimpy
    Posturing. Normal service will resume. Arseholes don't stop being arseholes, sadly. However, I'd love to be proved wrong.
  17. Stimpy
    Would you permit Christine to list all the allegations thrown at them tomorrow and name and shame the people behind them:)
  18. Stimpy
    You have to understand that Mark has been on the end of the most poisonous rumours on the internet that's started off on the forums going. I'm not surprised he's keeping it off his forum.
  19. Stimpy
    Do you think forums (GN excluded) and Rangers chat will tighten up on their moderation and encourage civil discussion after tomorrow?
  20. Stimpy
    No. The RST don't call fans scum, scam artists, threaten violence and generally discredit fellow bears. Indeed, when it was me, I blocked people for those actions In order to distance the RST from, IMO, Timmy behaviour. Tannochside's post is fair enough for me.
  21. Stimpy
    Thats a fair point. All the more reason why I'm not happy that the RST will be represented. Don't see why they should share the blame (meeting gives the look of cheap marriage counselling) of scummy smears when it's them who are on the end of them most of the time.
  22. Stimpy
    Do you prefer websites and forums, a radio station, self styled ultras and a magazine that are not accountable to anyone or without structure and rules that will discuss their own behaviour and future code of conduct as the way forward?
  23. Stimpy
    Groups and websites; there's a difference. Some are constituted and accountable. Others are not. You answered my question. Not sure what clarification you need when you've answered my question?
  24. Stimpy
    Rest of your post answers that dude.
  25. Stimpy
    No RSAs, TBO, UBs or even RF. Are they being represented?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.