Jump to content

 

 

OnlyOneAmoruso

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    480

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by OnlyOneAmoruso

  1. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I would still play him in defence. If Whittaker had played in December in the games Beasley & Novo did, then we would have seen the best of him. If we play that high pressing game then he doesn't have to defend as much and his frailties aren't exposed as frequently
  2. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I meant as well as Webster. Theres a distinct possibility that Wilson and Webster will be our only two 'senior' centre backs by the summer! Of course I'd be happier for Ness and Wylde/Campbell to get more game time
  3. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I really wouldn't mind seeing him at Ibrox. If we have to scrimp and scrape this summer then 3 players I would go for would be Barr, McArthur and Arfield.
  4. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Surely criticism of your criticism must be given respect also?
  5. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Has anyone seen the extract from his press conference yesterday? Dearie me!
  6. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I'm led to believe Broadfoot is on 3k per week currently and has been offered 6k. So the club has offered a contract and he wants to stay yet the contract remains unsigned. More pressure on the bank
  7. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Hi Craig, How much different was STS from We Deserve Better? I only briely glanced at STS but it seemed to have a lot of the same basic premise.
  8. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Did you honestly write that first sentence?
  9. OnlyOneAmoruso
    rbr is quite correct. Smith and even Bain have played things extremely well in the last 3 months or so. The latest being only naming 6 substitutes on Saturday when surely a further youth player could have been called in. They offered new contracts without the banks approval. Boyd wants to sign it but it hasn't been signed yet. What could possibly be blocking that deal? With Wilson and Fleck having 18 months left, there’s more than plenty of time to negotiate. In fact, both lads have stated they wish to stay. Yet stories leaked that they were off to chase the money down south. Nicely planted article perhaps? I thinks so.
  10. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I would say so Ian. He's a silly boy for even putting himself in these situations but no-one deserves to be falsely accused of something like this.
  11. OnlyOneAmoruso
    You really don't contribute anything at all do you?
  12. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Well, there seems to be a vast amount of dissenters who are rather intelligent and make excellent points. Perhaps they could form something of their own and mould it into a viable alternative?
  13. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Hey Zappa, re David and his apparent 'schmoozing'? He is Trust spokesman.... To be brutally honest, it's become a bit of a joke amongst fans who don't really seem to be offering any alternatives.
  14. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Fair enough mate and I'll apologise if that post has offended or risen anyones hackles. Would you perhaps agree that my comments would be irrelevant to some of the people you mention as further alienation is an impossibility?
  15. OnlyOneAmoruso
    David Edgar professes to represent exactly what he does represent, the Trust. Anyone who says otherwise is mischief making and twisting words imo. Just because everytime he speaks he doesn't say 'I speak on behalf of the RST' doesn't mean he thinks he speaks for the whole fanbase.
  16. OnlyOneAmoruso
    It was lighthearted as ever Bluedell (hence the smiley) In my experience David Edgar has my full backing but I realise I may be in a very small minority outwith of FollowFollow.
  17. OnlyOneAmoruso
    No-one will be interested unless theres a few holes to pick in his words mate
  18. OnlyOneAmoruso
    He published an article today.
  19. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Any more info on King's gardening leave Frankie? Am I the only one intrigued by that?
  20. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Fair point. I must just have made up that figure. Sorry
  21. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I've only heard of the league stat. I believe it's in the region of 150 games.
  22. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Good point re no legal obligation to accept less than face value. However, if they are doing it for other companies then surely it must be an option for ourselves?
  23. OnlyOneAmoruso
    I shan't go over the same tired old argument with you, no matter how much you would like me to.
  24. OnlyOneAmoruso
    Thomas.Jordan@eveningtimes.co.uk
  25. OnlyOneAmoruso
    To be honest, David hasn't asked to be given that title in the newspaper. Sounds a bit pedantic to me.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.