wabashcannonball

Someone on RM is alleging to have information as to the identity of the alleged assailant.I won't post a link I know how some here don't like other forums being quoted.

You really should read the post in context, i.e. the first two clauses.

A Strathclyde Police spokeswoman said: ââ?¬Å?We have received a complaint from a man in relation to being assaulted on Bath Street, Glasgow, on the evening of Saturday February 20. ââ?¬Å?Inquiries are ongoing.ââ?¬Â

As I said the irony would be lost on you, incidentally I never mentioned companies.

You seem a tad overwrought but that wont make a bad signing a good signing, even if he does drive a bentley and decides that people will get paid if he deems they deserve it, the irony of the last bit will obviously be lost on you, get rid WS double quick.

I would direct you to the 3rd post on the Greegs thread and there after, I was always taught not to opine until one knows the facts or most of them, the fact that you are unable to decide whither lafferty is the new Pele or Fatima Whitbread says more about your judgement than anything I can say, you obviously are not aware of previous high standards. Neither Waddell, Symon nor Wallace would have tolerated what passes at Ibrox these days for discipline.

Hardly personal, he isn't that high in my list of priorities, more an acknowledgement of how standards have slipped, I mean �£4 mill for a 6' 4" winger with no wings and even less ability says more than I ever could. I was fortunate to see some of the Rangers greats going back to Caldow, Shearer, Harold Davies a true Ranger and a true hero, Millar, Brand Wilson, Scott, McMillan, Baxter, Greig, I could go on for ever. So I need not apologise or hide my opinion of lafferty, I think I have a few good benchmarks to measure laffert against, and frankly he doesn't measure up at all.

If the attack took place on the north side of the city in Bath street nearest hospitals Royal or Western, why would Greegs be taken to Southern General the farthest away, as reported.

Shame on you ?.. you're havin a laff, lafferty is crap because he is crap that doesn't take much figurin out, if you think the sort of publicity and baggage he carries about reflects well on the club you're havin another laff, coyle must be laffin all the way back to the championship.

Latest. http://www.sportinglife.com/football/scottishpremier/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=soccer/10/02/21/SOCCER_McGregor.html

If you can't make up your mind whither he is a learner or a �£4 mill player, what can I say, me I just think he shouldn't be any where near a Rangers jersey...even in his bentley.

I reckon I would be looking for more than a learner for circa �£4 million, I hope WS was. Maybe you should read the OP.

Righty oh, your take on something you haven't read is duly noted in file 13.

I do believe unfortunately you are serious.

Naw I just think he is hopeless, a very very bad piece of business all round, good money wasted, that succinct enough.

Because I adhere to certain standards and ethics, how about you.

As I said true or not it's more bad publicity, pity there wasn't more about his actions on the pitch. Saw a comment about Brown on RM, absolutely beyond the pale that it has not been removed.

guy that posted the rumour inferred that his mate was a doctor at the RI, do you think his mate might be a horse doctor.

True or not, he keeps appearing in the papers for all the wrong reasons, time to cut your losses and ours WS at the earliest opportunity. http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/scottish/scottish_news/735436/Kyle-Lafferty-is-booted-out-of-house-after-10k-damage-is-caused.html

The process of reaching a resolution with respect to the extension of the bank's credit facility involved the merging of two distinctly different business plans, one promoted by Murray and acceptable to Lloyds Bank and the other prepared by the Rangers Board and senior management team. As every businessman would know in dealing with banks, one has to present a "sustainable business plan" but the devil in this regard is the view one takes on the ambitions of the Club as compared to the objectives of the bank in protecting its credit exposure. As you would suspect, there was rigorous debate that ensued as to the ingredients that would be incorporated into the financial plan on which, given the circumstances, we all eventually agreed. For example, the Board requested tolerance for payments that we still owed on players that we acquired one or two years ago, which amounted to about �£9 million at the end of June 2009. There was no flexibility on that issue although we have indeed paid off �£7 million against that debt in the last five months. On the other hand, the bank agreed to make no demand, despite media speculation to the contrary, for Rangers to manage its business plan to allow for any expedited repayment of the Club's debt. In fact, as set out in our financial statements at June 30 the bank has agreed that the Club's only obligation is to operate within a credit facility that reduces by �£1 million per year. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The thing I would like to know is to what extent the business plan of MIH ( I take it that is what AJ means rather than SDM, when he refers to Murray) was accepted and if it prevailed over the clubs boards input to a greater extent. It would appear Park or anyone else are going to be in for very hard negotiations, as opposed to the easy give away presented by piss poor hacks. http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3691409 http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jun/03/english-premier-league-debt

One of the most telling aspects of this whole sorry saga is that we have had more perceived Armageddons than Hollywood, yet the dark knight still has not been been dislodged from his lofty position......the danger is that he will return stronger, despite all that has been written and uttered of his demise into oblivion, ignore and dismiss him at our peril.

The thing that annoys me Frankie, is that despite our history and everything that goes with it, not one name jumps out at me and says " I am the man to lead you ", for a club of our esteem that cannot be right, but it appears to be that way to me.

You could be right there, but it would be useful to get a glimpse of where Minty thinks this is going.

Murray appears to be immune to pressure real or imagined, I often wonder what he would do if asked very publicly by as many supporters bodies as is possible, for a statement of affairs. You know the old saying if you don't ask you don't get, either he will give a response or he won't, my bet is he would.

Still puzzles how any meaningful negotiations can take place, when the chairman seems to know about as much as Darryl King or DJ as far as asking or selling price go, maybe Minty will fill him in with the next dispatches from the bunker at Charlotte Square.