aweebluesoandso

That's fair commnet, i won't answer every point or questions you pose Gaffer only just to say. I want a supporters representative on the board to represent our views, one case in point after the Scottish cup semi final invasion, the club were less than fully supportive of the fans being lied about in the Record. The Jane Hamilton pack of lies about the support holding up the Police from getting to Hampden and helping with the Hibernian fans invasion. I f we had a rep on the board maybe he could have done more to tackle those lies?

I'm not complaining about the dilution of shares per say, i'm complaining at the fact the more the support put in the less recognition we get ie no representation on the board.

We are currently the second largest shareholder after Dave King i believe, also we spent £1mil buying half Ashley's shares and removing him from the club. In my opinion getting rid of Ashley should have resulted in the support getting board representation. I know what share dilution is, but didn't know when i joined C1872m it was forthcoming.

I joined the RST five years ago, Rangers First three years ago and C1872 two years ago all thereabouts? there was no mention of Safe standing, Projects which interested me so i contribute to it and contribution to share purchase, plus RST share scheme when that was going all merge i believe. So i think the support do their bit, bit of payback by board representation is not to much to ask?

Yes, I get rewarded for something i won't use, my reward will be getting a fans Rep on the board.

I'm not surprised i'm disappointed. We the support keep putting into the club through C1872, there's talk of C1872 financially helping with Safe Standing, further projects too and the supporters rewards is?

Probably not as my guess is he's waiting patiently, for the tims job?

I agree BD, Our shares are diluting , so we have to buy more just to keep it at the same level. Not only that we bought half of Ashley's share for £1mil, think about that for a second £1mil of supporters money to remove a malevolent force from our club and the reward is, buy more shares or you might not get board representation. Feck me why do i feel like the support is getting the shit end of the stick again?

Ingrained on my memory, still have the nightmares.

Bomber Brown on the steps at the front door at Ibrox, 2012?

Haha been called worse.

So the so called independent Green Party who align themselves to the SNP in most things including independence, were allowed to vote for a repeal, convenient that. The SNP didn't want to lose face so the Greens did the dirty work for them as per.

How did it get reapled then if no SNP MSP's voted for its repeal, what was the vote, 62 to 60 to ? I think you're being economical with the truth, a good number of SNP MSP's were in favour of it's repeal, yes a Labour MSP did champion it but the SNP ones with a love for anything celtic, Republican were working in the background for it's destruction. You know it and everyone else knows it.

Gaffer it's been pointed out further up on the thread, D'art was a full board member of C1872, who then resigned from that position after a few months.

What another group of Nats, Republicans and Green Brigade members, who spout pish about bigotry, racism and Independence, who are themselves the main perpetrators to the very ethos they claim to oppose. That's how they work, the very same c@nts who wanted oh so desperately the OBAF laws, then ran screaming to their fellow travelling dangleberries in the SNP to have the law repealed, when they were quite rightly charged under that law.

What are we charging Dave King here with? He's already been dealt with the COS for working in concert with others to take control of Rangers. Are people really complaining that the takeover rules weren't followed 100%, to remove the malevolent wreckers who were in previous control of the club? Personally i think the vast majority of supporters don't give two Monkey's about that, yes they do keep one eye on the board, you just have to read on this very forum the concern about the fact this board do the See no evil, Hear no evil, and Speak no evil routine far to regularly, to the dismay of the Bears. If there is something else going on or in the pipeline let's hear it?

I'm not fussed whether our system is a 4-4-2, 4-4-1-1 or even a 3-4-2-1, whatever it's horses for courses, but our two best strikers Cummings and Morelos need a start. You can't have any of those two sitting as a spectator when they have goals in them, you have a solid squad of what at the moment with all the injuries? Say ten players who are a definite start then any permation between five players for that last spot, then the manager needs to work out the system and possible changes to the system depending how the opposition line up. Easy for me to write on a forum, but surely it's not out the reach of a savvy manager.

Whit? a club that promoted and agitates still that we are a new club, also heavily influenced other club to remove us from the SPL, then tried to thieve our titles and we still honour any agreements between clubs. You have to be joking? But sadly you are probably correct, un fecking believable craven cowardness,

I thank Murty for standing in when Warburton then Pedro departed, it was a poisoned chalice he was handed. But to his credit he's handled it pretty well. but his limitations are shown up, against far more experienced managers. Yesterday he couldn't seem to work out how to handle Killie's high pressure against us, sixty minutes his alarm went off reminding him his subs were due an outing. Not the fact that we needed to change the system to get behind their defence, something that missing for most of the game. He's doing his apprenticeship at Rangers really well , but it's a full time-served tradesman the club needs.

Basically is was a straight swap Cummings starting for Morelos, Cummings is not suited as the lone striker role. Like you point out it's a balancing act, but it's a balancing act with both starting that's needed, Morelos is better suited as the workhorse, Cumming the more natural goal scorer. Murty has to come up with a balanced system that includes these two players, working as a partnership.

The apprentice was outthought by the tradesman again today.

Here we are five days after several of our fans, one a child, were hurt by the those vermin squatting in the Broomloan, and the club have not uttered one word in their defence. Frankly that's not good enough, the fan's safety seems to have a indifferent attitude from this board , that's an appalling situation for a club like Rangers.

I can't get my head around Rangers fans being members of the SNP, when they can see with their own eyes the openly hostile and anti-Rangers agenda. Not only that but the SNP have without a shadow of doubt gone down the Sinn Fein route of belligerent Brit bashing, gathering to their poisonous breast the Republican terrorist, British citizen murdering psychopaths, who see our club and support as a legitimate target, as they do in Northern Ireland with the PUL community. For their goal of a United Ireland, but in Scotland they use their political agitation and hatred to secure a breakaway for an Independent Scotland and the breakup of the Uk. Little regard for Scotland as it's not their first love, merely a route to an end for them. For me any Rangers fan supporting the SNP in this current culture of British, Unionist bashing, would be better off joining the Green Brigade, Sinn Fein or the IRA, because they have clearly more in common with them now, than any Rangers supporters i know, which i would say is the vast majority of us. Out of courtesy to this forum i will leave this here and remove myself from the thread, other than to say until things change for the better, i will look on any SNP Rangers supporters as i would any Tim or Green Brigade element, with disgust.

I'll tell you what's really sinister and Malevolent in Scotland, SNP cyber thugs attacking two great Scottish companies employing hundreds of fellow scots. Just because the use a Union Jack on their advertising materials on Shortbread and biscuit tins. No consideration that it might cost jobs or redundancies, so long as their bitter anti British attitudes are pandered to, with the removal of a sales aid.

The SNP has taken Scotland down a dark and dangerous route, they attack anything British, Unionist and Protestant. The SNP encouraged the Republican terrorist supporting elements to form a axis of evil. I said this a few years ago and got laughed at, now it's out in the open for all to see, not many are laughing now. Politics in this country is now virtually a mirror image of the Northern Ireland situation, add in to that Rangers supporters are now marked for attack by the Nationalist, Republican hate mobs.