Jump to content

 

 

rbr

  • Posts

    6,453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by rbr

  1. It's not a no brainer and I would argue on the money side , especially if he doesn't play regularly , time will tell , to be honest I'm just glad it's over , the way some are going on you would think it was Messi we were arguing about
  2. I actually take the opposite view , they get less money , lose the player and get another who isn't anywhere near as good , , scot Allan will never get the honor of playing for us , for what it's worth we are the biggest winners in this
  3. Finished 4-3 to Rangers , sounded like a fantastic game , great comeback from 3-1 down at HT
  4. http://therangersreport.com/2015/08/08/analytical-match-report-rangers-3-st-mirren-1/ This aim of this Analytical Match Report is to enhance the analysis of Rangers performance by providing a variety of advanced stats from the game. Explanations of these stats can be found in our tutorial for these reports. Expected Goals: Rangers 4.0 St. Mirren 0.6 Rangers generated 25 shots against a team that was playing in the Premiership last season as they continue their trend of dominating play & producing a high volume of shots. St. Mirren’s Expected Goals do not include the penalty shot – so in the run of play, they failed to prove to be any threat against Rangers defence. If Rob Kiernan was not caught flat footed on the counter attack, St Mirren would have been headed towards a shut-out. The score was 2-1 for much of the match & hypothetically the result was in doubt, but after that missed penalty St. Mirren never really threatened to tie up the game. Shot Quality Breakdown: Of the shots Rangers took, 40% came from High Danger or Very High Danger areas, with 60% coming from Low to Medium Danger areas. I’m sure Mark Warburton would prefer to see those numbers flipped, but regardless, Rangers are generating a large number of quality opportunities. What is more impressive is that they were playing against an opponent that was conceding possession & stacking their defensive numbers looking to frustrate Rangers. Besides the penalty shot, which is not included in the above chart, Rangers only allowed one shot from within the penalty area & that was on the goal. Possession vs. Quality Possession: Those bars are moving in the right direction & for the second consecutive game, Rangers dominance is ascending. From dominating possession, to the number of shots, to the amount of actual shots on target – Rangers are completely dictating the terms of each match they have played so far, particularly the past two games. Their opponents are rarely getting a chance to create any offense so when they do, they are not breaking down the defence in the final third, rather they are taking shots from outside the penalty area in order to generate any kind of attack. Lee Wallace, courtesy of SNS Shooting Efficiency: Shots Shots on Target Sh Acc Sh % Rangers 25 10 0.400 0.300 St Mirren 6 1 0.167 1.000 Wes Foderingam still only has made one save in three games…but then again Rangers have only allowed a total of four shots on target. Rangers Report Game Chart: Besides dominating the shot totals from the outset, what’s most noticeable is that final push in the final 15 minutes. An early trend this season is Rangers ability to finish off matches with a final burst that, quite frankly has overwhelmed teams so far. Goalkeeper Distribution Ratings: This advanced stat is unique to Rangers Report & is explained in this post. GDR Wes Foderingam 0.74 Mark Ridgers 0.26 Outside of one howler, this was a brilliant example of Foderingam beginning possession from the back & then his teammates either carrying the ball into the offensive half or sending precise passes from the back into attack. Foderingham went short with his distribution 74% of the time & Rangers turned that into possession in St. Mirren’s half 88% of the time. Ridgers relied on a long ball 100% of the time & Rangers were able to gain control of the ball 74% of the time. Individual Outliers: courtesy of RFC Martyn Waghorn continues to create quality chances & managed five shots on goal. Unfortunately, not a single shot was on target. The good news, however, is that three of the five shots came from High Danger Areas. courtesy of RFC That’s 12 shots in the past two games for James Tavernier & given that he is a right back, ten of those twelve shots have come from Low Danger areas. Tavernier has proven to be a scoring threat but at some point you wonder if he will be urged to get the ball into the box rather then shooting. courtesy of SMFC Danny Wilson looked shaky at times, while he & Rob Kiernan combined for five fouls in the defensive half of the pitch. courtesy of SMFC Only two Rangers players failed to register a shot on goal – one was Danny Wilson, the other was Nicky Law. Law was quiet at times but was effective in breaking up plays in midfield as his all around game is getting noticed more. You can follow Rangers Report on Twitter @TheGersReport
  5. This is just stupid from Hibs , never has keeping an unhappy player worked out , especially one in the last year of his contract who has made it clear he is not going to sign a knew contract and almost certainly will sign a precontract with us come Dec 1st , they are on a lose lose situation , better settling on a deal for money or players and moving on
  6. They are hooded either way to be honest , imho you are always better having players commited to your team , Allan is just a distraction they can do without , when it's obvious he's coming to us either way
  7. He can sign on 1st Dec this year ,less than 17 weeks away
  8. Sorry GS , I was thinking about older players , not ones still with years ahead of them , but I take your point . Last year every player ally signed was old and had no value
  9. Highlights from the U 20's game
  10. We really dont want to go down the route of bringing ex players back , it will just bring comparisons with the last management team
  11. Unless we offer what they want , it's just getting stupid , just wait and get him on Dec 1st
  12. Doesn't really matter it's the managers opinion that counts , just like last years only myself and gunslinger consistently argued against Vuckic being the second coming of Christ ,
  13. Haha typo , should have read mourhino , but touche ,my bad lol
  14. I cannot wait fir Friday night
  15. Lucy your not allowed an opinion on players , truly is secretly mourning
  16. We don't have any scouts , the manager picked him out and got him , his opinion will do for me ! As for the rest of your post , please engage your brain before posting , I go to all the gersnet meals , and would be more than happy to have a pint and discuss any differences , no problems . I just can't stand know it all,s who can decide 100% on a player after seeing him twice , it's the same as the team , we can't make judgements either way until they bed in , probably IMHO around Xmas , but that's only my opinion
  17. You just keep on making stupid posts , you are brilliant at them , in fact why not put your cv into the club , your obviously the missing link
  18. Sorry but that's just a stupid statement , no one can possibly know how any player will turn out What after 4 games , aye ok right you are
  19. Sorry but that's just a stupid statement , no one can possibly know how any player will turn out
  20. you need to trust the manager and sir davie , they havent gotten anything wrong so far and with the talk of stevie may or another striker coming in , young calum would have seen very little first team action , hardie seems to have jumped ahead of him anyway
  21. They have enough money for both , buying shares now and taking up their full allocation later
  22. Sorry but bloggers like anyone else lose IMHO any privileges when they put lies online , when they take payment in exchange for putting articles which have the sole intent of harming the club, Chris Graham may have a lot of people who dislike him but again IMHO he has never done anything that has harmed the club
  23. Am amazed that anyone can compare the current board to the previous one , each to their own I suppose
  24. You cannot compare this board with the previous one , not even in the same solar system
  25. When any fan crosses the line and acts as a paid mouth piece for ex directors they deserve all they get
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.