rbr

Pete , from the very start ,it was pointed out that they should take a breather get all these issues sorted prior to any vote being put to the members of both schemes , it would have been discussed and agreed by elected members of those schemes not unelected guys who in many cases we still don't know who they are , why the rush when we are now in a situation that they are having to sort these things with no comeback from members . As for my other point , CG appears every now and then doesn't answer questions directly but makes general statements telling everyone they are wrong and disappears , CS I have on my phone so can get in contact with easily , but again rarely posts now , on other forums the guys who championed this nearly 24/7 have disappeared , never to be seen , it's pathetic . As for a membership scheme being around for years , your absolutely correct , I myself sent an ideal to Martin Bain nearly 20 years ago , but the scheme I am talking about was club1872 , which Martin Stenhouse has admitted was their idea , hardly independent , and this only works if it's independent , we don't none of us know the future and who will be our board in 5 , 10 years never mind 5, 10 months time. And just one other point , just where in all the discussions around this merger was an unelected wp mentioned .

Sorry Pete didn't see this whilst I posted my latest rant , Your first point is no , The second point is also no , The third is the club via members of the RST ,it was brought up at a club meeting we were told with both RF and the RST , where the club stated they wanted to work with just one group , it's since transpired that the seeds of club1872 were well down the road prior to that meeting , The vote that started this was about unifying the support not killing of RF , but that was always going to happen , The unelected wp are making all the decisions without any feedback to us the members , there is no. Communication what so ever , there us nothing on the club1872 site , and they do not answer emails

Pete , to an extent I agree with you , where I completely disagree is where you state I have been against this from the start . At the start of RF we were promised again and again that this very scenario could never happen because of the way RF was set up, and the way the RST model was set up , that was a lie . We were then told that any new group would be the same as RF , ie, totally independent of the club , again a lie , at the recent meeting of club172 with RSCs , Martin Stenhouse a club employee , stated that club1872 was a club idea . When at the very start of this the conflict of interest points were raised , we were told we didn't know what we were talking about , when it was pointed out they were rushing this , we were told we didn't know what we were talking about , when we asked what would be the structure of the new group , we were told they didn't have one but not to worry they would work it out later on . This is a scheme with hundreds of thousands of pounds in its accounts , it's not a wee bowling club committee , there are regulations that cover this and people better get to grips with this point and rapido . We were never told there would be an unelected working group set up to over see every aspect of the new group , why , because all hell would have broken out . The worst thing is that now it's done , all the figureheads have disappeared of social media , you can't get them for love nor money , yet prior to the change every forum was polluted with propaganda about how brilliant this was , this new scheme has been in effect active for months now yet the membership has decreased , it's no bloody wonder .

GS it's club1872 they are talking about not RF

Sorry buster , I am at a complete loss as to what your posting about regards CH or DK et all and what this has to do with the demise of RF by a club led scheme . I have been consistent from day one on this and have asked repeatedly for time to be taken to avoid exactly the shambles we are seeing now , also it's not a small amount of anonymous posters , there are many fans who attended the open meeting who voiced the same concerns , only to be shouted down and told we were " anti " Rangers , utter pish , this could have been fantastic for our club , now I fear it's doomed before it's even gotten off the ground

Seriously if that's aimed in any way at me then your a million miles out as you obviously don't know me apart from posting on here

Organised campaign against whom buster , I'm at a loss to what your suggesting

Holy shit as we believed , sold down the river https://resignationletters.wordpress.com/2016/07/04/resignation-letters/

This will be the same guy who whilst encouraging a boycott attended the same games he was telling others to boycott, Sorry just been sent a copy of the resignation letters from the three RF directors , will be back later

So just so I'm clear , your quite happy with what Craig Houston , a club1872 unelected spokesman has posted and the inference behind it

Not a hope in hell either player will be on anything like those wages

I feel at this stage in our redevelopment they have , until we get on a firm financial footing I just don't see how we can justify spending millions on transfer fees , to be honest I don't think we need to given the state of Scottish football .This season coming will give us a much better indication of MW and his player recruitment , at the moment I'm more than happy

Wales 1-1 Portugal Germany 2-1 France

The only curve ball could be for getting the top scorer correct , you could add points for that

Ian I agree 100% ,I'm not getting involved again , I'm done with it

Ian we were told when this all started that it was nothing to do with the club , it was a fan led initiative , now after months , at a meeting of RSC,s we are told that after all it was a club decision , when we argued about impartiality we were told we were being stupid and we're all wrong , well guess what , RF has been killed for what , we were lied to them and are still being lied to . It's a disgrace , RF could have been the start of something fantastic

Don't really know what's funny about a guy , Rangers legend or not , actively promoted by the club via the press , who when elected onto a board overseeing hundreds of thousands of pounds of supporters money , never attended a single meeting . This isn't a bowling club committee mate , this is serious and has serious consequences if due diligence isn't followed , the fact you think it's funny goes to show the ignorance of the support of decisions such as these

Welcome bluegates hope you stick around , this is a great site

Embarrassing for someone .........

But we keep getting told they are all one and the same now , you can't have it both ways