rbr

Maineflyer there are guys in my work , who are in their late 20's who believe this tripe that we are worse , when you challenge them they have no arguement other than "well that's what they say on the radio ...papers etc " blah blah

What chance in hell have you got when even " Reporters " like Hugh Keevins stated live on Rc last night that " Rangers have had a sectarian signing policy for over 120 years " .Tell a lie often enough .......... you reap what you sow in life , the dignified silence MUST end

I agree whole heartedly , however to some MD and the RST are one in the same

81 posts to work you out MF , you must be slipping mate lol , ahhh the joy of the good old internet banter , ye cannae whack it

yes someone posted in the thread about Rangersmedia's support about Muir , it lasted all of half an hour before it was slaughtered , look back at post 26 on this topic to see one of his answers

Craig , if you look at my history of posting , its one of the reasons I came to this wondeful oasis , because of the lack of the above , the thread Rabbit posted or was posted for him , was going along very very nicely until G_S came along and destroyed any harmony that was there , it's always the same people who cry about being hard done to , and when you look closely it's always them that have the stench of hypocrisy around them

Suck has been accused himself on several forums of laying into fellow fans and of being quick with the old mitts , as for �£�£ , I dont believe it is censored as you think because every hit counts , and thats what its all about on �£�£ ...money money money , t shirts , get togethers abroad etc etc all about the money

G_s may only be one person, but he holds great sway over the vast majority who post on �£�£ , again unfortunate but true

I think you can take it from this that �£�£'s leader doesn't agree , he also doesn't do irony I've never met therabbit and therefore can't blame him for the behaviour of others. As for those others - when you are aware of the campaign of threats and intimidation against your erstwhile colleagues it beggars belief that "Rangers fans" would ally themselves with the threateners. Nor, I would hope, should anyone calling themselves a Rangers fan hand over internal communications to which you were privy to club directors with the express intention of sabotaging the work of the Trust. Whilst therabbit's plea for unity may be genuine there are people who's behaviour has excluded themselves from the right to call themselves Rangers fans. If you tolerate and titter in the background (or allow your forum to be a platform) while people are subject to threats (ranging from being killed, to being slashed to being 'given a slap') or the vilest personal slurs (theft, sexual misconduct, informer, etc) then you can't reasonably expect to be taken seriously when you turn round and say 'aw shucks, we made a boo-boo, can we be pals?' No-one holds all the members of a forum liable for the conduct of a few, but when those few are given houseroom in leadership positions you'll understand why pious calls for unity can't be taken seriously. You've made your bed, you've got to lie in it.

It also happened to be true , but I bow to your ability to ban me ........

Cannot believe GS' comments about this article , talk about believing your own hype

EDITED - let's avoid the nonsense please - Frankie

Dont tell me , Dave King and Paul Murray have finally surfaced

Have put it up on VB as well Frankie

Frankie , there has been a whole load of rubbish written . the problem as I see it is that there are so many factions within our own club who are plotting against each other whilst the biggest snake aka Murray gets away scot free yet again ,I read Boss's article on RM as well and even that is a load of pish , deflect deflect and deflect again , we will never get to the bottom of this rotten affair , and it's getting to the stage that this takkeover is now more important than the league

It might be interesting to find out who the 2 director's who were against Whyte actually are , I believe the names widely quoted are wrong

No , not unless Murray removes him, which will only occur I believe should this take over fall through

AJ has already stated to the press off the record that his business dealings with Murray have now ceased , as off 1st april

That , Frankie , sums up the modern day Rangers support

Never mind the RST are hard at it , they have a dinner to organise

And these songs have been banned by due judicial process or because some jobs worth has been shut in a cupboard for a few days till he makes alist , absolute shite

You only need look at various sites this morning m they are more interested in " look at me " statements and "we were right about Muir " than about the bigger issue's and the biggest of all , that the charlatan Murray , who lets face it the whole sorry mess revolves around , is going to swan off into the distance with out even a by your leave ...... shameful stuff , but hey it's ok Stephen smith of the RST stated he has a moral responsibility to pay the tax bill ,,,, my good god Murray couldn't even spell moral

This whole sorry mess should at last open the eyes of even the most fervent Murrayite to the disgraceful way he has handled his custodianship of what was a once great institution , the fact that he is willing , in fact more than willing to allow this great club to be reduced to it's present level never mind where , god forbid , it might end up shows him for what he is . Like MF above I would love to be going to Ibrox today , I was a season ticket holder for over 20 years , bondholder , shareholder , bought the strips , Rangers news blah blah blah , it doesn't bother Murray one iota that guys like me no longer feel able to give him my support , some will look upon that as being unworthy of a genuine supporter so be it , but everyone must make their own stand ,this is getting to be our own last stand , we have very little room left to manouver , it's ok for Murray he can bugger off to his Chateau or his villa's where ever . He is the owner of this club and as such has a duty and obligation to look after it , however what he is doing is not only shameful but cowardly and deserves nothing more than contempt .

Whyte told to take on Rangers tax risk Published on 2 Apr 2011 BUSINESSMAN Craig Whyte will have to take on any responsibility arising from a multi-million-pound dispute between Rangers and the taxman if he wants to buy the club, The Herald understands. Mr Whyte faces the crucial decision on whether he is willing to buy the club on this basis as make-or-break takeover talks enter their final stages. The case between Rangers and HM Revenue & Customs is due to come before a tribunal within weeks. Amid reports that the liability could run into tens of millions of pounds if Rangers were to lose, the tax question appears to be a potentially major obstacle to a deal. The issue, which concerns using an employee benefits trust to remunerate players, will almost certainly have been one of the biggest areas of Mr Whyte’s due diligence work on Rangers’ books. The crux of the deal emerged on a day when the club released interim financial figures showing a retained profit of Ã?£9 million but a decrease in turnover and season-ticket sales. In an interview after presenting the results, Alastair Johnston, the Rangers chairman, was reported to have suggested the club could go out of business if it were to lose the tax ruling. But in an unusual move last night the club released a statement via the Plus Stock Exchange to “clarify that our chairman did not state that the club could go out of business”. Earlier, Mr Johnston had revealed the club’s prospective new owner had held another positive meeting yesterday before takeover talks were put on hold for the weekend. Johnston had earlier claimed a Whyte buy-out would be “good” for Rangers and it could be that an offer worth around Ã?£27m for Sir David Murray’s 85% shareholding is made in mid week. But the Ibrox chairman also admitted the dispute with HMRC over a major tax case remained “the gorilla in the room”: the cost could be Ã?£30m. Despite suggestions that Sir David Murray’s Murray International Holdings, which owns 85% of Rangers, might provide some indemnity or warranty to Mr Whyte on the tax issue, this appears highly unlikely. The club’s shares are traded on the PLUS stock market, with small shareholders, including fans, owning about 9%. Rangers declared that it continued to “vigorously contest” HMRC’s challenge and “in doing so continue to receive reassuring opinion from tax, accounting, and legal specialists”. The latest accounts of Murray International, meanwhile, reveal no provision for any potential liability. In the accounts, seen by The Herald, Murray International states: “On the basis of expert tax advice, the group continues to defend a tax query raised by HMRC into the operation of an employee benefit trust. This is scheduled for resolution by a tax tribunal in 2011. “The directors, having considered professional advice, are of the view that it is reasonable not to provide for amounts in respect of this matter.” Rangers believe there is legal precedent in favour of the club from a case involving a company called Dextra which came before the House of Lords.