Leaderboard

Would Walsh have added on 15 minutes if Shellik were winning? 😳 I think not

38 shots on goal - was Dessers playing for Celtic today 😉😄

Time for a change? I achieved a link to ra Sellik versus the Dandies in the lieu of hearing Aberdeen had gone 2-3 up with twenty minutes to play. It was ra Sellik TV with Gerry McCulloch informing those viewing that the mighty reds third was correctly cancelled for hand ball. Next on the 80th minute, Gerry reckoned there were at least 14 minutes to be added on after the ninety. I switched to PQ CSC broadcasting and they were demanding at least ten minutes be added on. In the 91st minute, ten minutes was on the board being held up on the sideline and the Gang Hut exhaled, "anything can happen". Nick Walsh eventually blew his whistle in the 15th minute of the ten minutes added. The national broadcaster fail failed to mention this anomaly. It is what Peter wants.

I'd love to see a back-three, but I'd prefer a situational back-three. Nana in for Tavernier at RB. Nana would stay back to make a back-three with Jefte pushing forward on the left. This lets us use a proper winger wide right while also letting us revert to a back-four in defence. The 4-4-2 is best for pressing, too, which is more tricky to switch to if we start with a proper back-three.

The only irk Ive had with Clement is his resistance to change. We are crying out for more in the final third so why is a back 3 never an option. Even with a back 4 then flood the midfield with real midfielders, but don't rely on Lawrence getting a showboating moment every week as he is wasteful for 89 minutes.

Not to memtion that miss.

The reasons for those fans saying that were entirely different from my reason regarding Kent. Put simply: I think he's f*cking garbage. Even 'peak Kent' only turned up about seven or eight times a season. I thought he was a flop for the silly money we paid the Scouse tramps.

Bad day for the gunners man sent off and lose two nil

We are right back in it when we win tomorrow

McAlpine as far as I can recall would wear a blue jersey v them and a green v us.

Let us hope that He gets Dessers to stop moving in mysterious ways, and to start playing like a Rangers' centre forward.

Aye but the Lord doth other things too.

The lord giveth, I'd ask him to giveth some more.

Great wee boast then realise we still have to play tomorrow.....😄

Tomorrow is last chance for Rangers. If they can’t stir themselves to win, they deserve nothing.

Unreal, injury time added for nowt and the fact the Sheep gave it a better go of it at the chamber of secrets than we did.

104 minutes, eh? Gave them every chance.

Yes. Hot Air

Have to say I love the nostalgia stuff about late 80s and 90s Scottish (and some english) football. And I cant believe with the list of proper players how no manager has ever got us beyond knock out stages. Sportscene, Scotsports, The Green Final was my weekend. Always thought Henry Smith was decent - yet Hearts should have wont a title (86) but Rough was exactly that - Rough! But I didnt see him before 85. Yet I remember watching Dundee Utd and McAlpine pulling of top corner saves etc.

Would a player, that we signed tonight, be eligible to play against Kilmarnock?

Such winds may lift the pitch, entirely - by gales to Gailes, so to speak. Would that mean the award of a 0-3 win?

Aye. Better than Smith, more solid than Rough without Rough’s ability to make the occasional impossible save. Can’t remember what he was like at saving penalties but he was good at taking them. Absolutely.

Apparently, this is its last season, and Kilmarnock will have a grass pitch for 25/26. I know nothing about the care and maintenance of artificial surfaces, and their sub surface layers, but I should think that, as this season progresses, Kilmarnock will become less, and less, inclined to expend money on keeping the pitch in the best condition feasible. The club will be at least tempted to undertake damage repair based on the pitch's decreasing life span. 'Dummying up', continually, may be the likely outcome. God knows how it will 'play' towards the end of the season.

Came across this article

I think the fans were glad to see the back of him

I'd go for 5-0 home win

You're claiming as fact a subjective opinion. The raw stats show that Matondo has a better goal involvement than Kent. You can opine that Kent has contributed more, but you cannot claim it as fact.

Exactly - As most of us are saying - the fact is Kent is better than we currently have doesn't mean we want him back. Its not really that difficult to understand.

Surely any sensible person judges a player on their recent performances and not ones from two to three years ago? Kent just had his contract terminated because he's been rubbish in Turkey. He was rubbish with us for two seasons prior to that as well (like absolutely useless). I'm going to call it Benign Nostalgia Delusion Syndrome.

Cerny has scored the same amount of goals that Kent scored in his final season with us, in 32 fewer games. And Cerny hasn't been great. #JustSaying

NAW. Just Naw.