Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 19/04/22 in all areas
-
Didn't know where to put this. Wes Foderingham and John Fleck. Staunch.4 points
-
Time for the SFA to scour it's ranks of Parkhead acolytes for suitable candidates to run VAR in Scotland.3 points
-
We've won some really big matches with GvB at the helm. The problem has been the more run of the mill stuff and dropping points against the likes of Ross County and Motherwell. There's no way Rangers will be sacking him at the end of the season, even if we win nothing, so we should get behind him.3 points
-
It’s too late to expect dignity from Celtic. Everything I’ve ever seen from that horrible club has only emphasised the size of the chip on their collective shoulder. Even during their periods of success they’re only preoccupation is their hatred of Rangers.3 points
-
Perhaps. However i believe he has earned the right now to get a summer to bring in his own players and have a go next season.3 points
-
My report on today's game https://rfcyouths.wordpress.com/2022/04/19/shootout-win-for-colts/2 points
-
The first VAR decision that costs Celtic points will set of a storm of protest, prompting the SFA to decide that any VAR decision going against Celtic in future will have to be independently checked by the Bishop of Glasgow.2 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
They all did, it was a Championship club that voted no.1 point
-
16th May on email would be correct, no? 16th May on mine. Just checked club website it’s 16th May. https://www.rangers.co.uk/season-ticket-general-faqs/2M7eXd3ztPte66S3QYEVKq1 point
-
1 point
-
Would VAR have made any difference on Sunday? We may have had a penalty at the start, if they checked it. Their goal may have been ruled offside, but probably not. I think it would be allowed to stand. Bassey looked like he was onside for our goal so no issue there. It wouldn't have picked up the various tackles that could have been yellows.1 point
-
1 point
-
The only reason for "buliding bridges" with these cunts is to give them a high platform from which to throw themselves.1 point
-
I think what he has shown is that he learns from his/our mistakes. He has a plethora of different tactics and formations that he’s had success with. I’d argue that we haven’t seen a manager of Rangers that has a plan A, B, C etc. We could still end the season empty handed, but I’ve warmed to Gio lately (from someone that wasn’t even keen on him from the start) and I would be behind him getting at least next season to see who he brings in and what level of success he’s capable of , domestically speaking.1 point
-
I think we should stop undermining our manager and understand that you only count the winners at the finishing line, not half way round the first corner. Come the end of the season after next, you might have some idea whether GvB was a good Rangers manager or not.1 point
-
made two mistakes with his feet and gave me several heart attacks. Still overall he did very well. We are in good hands.1 point
-
Lundstram, clear ahead of Bassey this time (its usually one of these two these days). He is turning out to be exactly what this team has been missing. Took a while to get going but great to have something to build the team around next season.1 point
-
1 point
-
Hearts is their common name. Full title Heart of Midlothian? Hibernian derived from Hibernia surely?1 point
-
I missed that one. Lets hope we have competent people running VAR when it happens.1 point
-
It's clear to me our success yesterday was in no small measure due the manager wearing appropriate footwear.1 point
-
Could see another Charlton Athletic whose fans were "sick and tired" of boring 6th - 10th place First Division finishes and wanted Curbishley out. The board listened and the rest is history.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Our chums at PQ won't be happy to hear @Govan Rear Bear from the Gersnet Podcast on BBC 5 Live last night, enjoying the Cup win... 33:50 for Colin's appearance who did a fine job of sobering up to join Ben and Carlton and enjoy yesterday's win. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0c1rxdt1 point
-
1 point
-
Considering the things that have occurred at that disgusting club, I think that is pretty low down the list of things to pull them up for. They have facilitated and then covered up the sexual abuse of young boys (by multiple participants), as well as providing a platform for the support of proscribed terrorist organisations.1 point
-
They have the option of funding the club, although they've already lied about that before. Their priority is to buy shares from King and not the club. It's all about personal agendas and quid pro quo. Why would any supporter want hundreds of thousands of pounds that could go to the club to go to a third party?1 point