Leaderboard

Separate Entity FC 0-0 FT, a good result ?

Stats my chooky one goal more than the opposition is the best stat you can get . Mon the gers

Seemingly got a softer than soft penalty,with Livi player ordered, off in "sceptic Time" and their big Greek made a right mess of it. With Hearts getting beat it is in our hands to get lead back to what it was last week.

Roofe should be starting every game. He's our canniest striker IMO.

Not looking forward to tomorrow's match, in all honesty. We're not good to watch at the moment, often starting poorly, only playing with intensity in short bursts, predictable going forward (or should that be sideways) and defensive lapses seem almost inevitable. Any win will do.

Kyogo should get a ban after that. I wont hold my breath !

I'm actually buzzing for the game now and have to say I wasn't before the 3 o clock kick offs today. Time for the real Rangers to turn up and then start motoring

Their result today is certainly an unexpected boost. Come on Rangers, get a win tomorrow!!! ??

Oh I know, maybe my post wasn't worded correctly. If we are winning 3-0 some fans would like squad players getting minutes. All fine and well but if we then don't score any more goals, another or even same sections of fans will be unhappy at that. Another quandary.

Goal difference is an actual thing. Fickle fans are ones who leave early, don't turn up or stop caring when things aren't going well.

Even more reason to pummel teams in the first half. When 3 up at half time, understudies can then be given the opportunity to show what they can do.

So we drop our top scoring defender and player with most assists in League in the "hope" Patterson can match him? And if he doesn't?

Without a decent run in the team we will never find out.

Always tough going at Fir Park and expect Sunday to be no different, if anything it's going to be even tougher with the tims expected to go top on Saturday. I see this as our biggest test since beating them before the xmas break a couple of season ago and coming home from Dubai to lose to Killie.

Analysing the pro's and cons of different formations is pointless if players continue to be disorganised and hesitant in defence, keep underhitting passes and continue to be caught in possession so often. The issue isn't formations, it's players who were once comfortable when given time and space to play but are badly exposed when pressed and crowded, particularly in defence. The other PL teams have rumbled how to neutralise our style of play and too many of our regular starters are showing the fragility of their confidence as a result - you can see this in Barisic, Tavernier and Kamara. Bringing back Kent, Jack and Helander will make more difference than changing any formation on paper. I also think we badly miss the sheer competitiveness of Arfield and would be starting him as a matter of course while we continue to struggle.

People are already calling for Kent to return ... As it stands, we don`t need another winger/AM trying his luck with a varying degree of success against a tight and packed defense. It`s not like Kent was banging them in like CR7 or the like. Its not his job either. I see people drumming on about modern football et al, de facto, a 4-3-3 robs us of one striker and one winger against tight defenses. But, but the fullbacks are attacking too?!?!?! So what, in a 4-4-2 the fullbacks attack too, effectively giving us somewhere between 4 and 6 attcking players, with 2 CHs covering (as they do now, one DM clearing up the midfield and one MF being creative. Turn it as you will, our current setup is not up to the game as it is played in Scotland. We have one main striker who has to do it on his own against 2 or 3 CHs, who now goes deep or drags defenders to the wings ... only to leave an empty space behind that is not well covered by the MFs (simply because we play 2 DMs who are not really willing to attack and/or shoot). Aribo`s position is an enigma to me this season, as he pops up here and there and you have to hope that Hagi and him come up with something ... only to see them try the double- or triple-one-two in that super-tight area in and around the box. And rest assured, with Kent it is the very same. How often have we put balls into the area this season with hardly anyone from us covering the spaces or running into attacking areas (like Arfield did when he came on, as it is his game)? We are probably top of the charts in possession, not least around the half-way-line, with Kamara and Co. spraying passes and we hope for a killer pass from one of our centre-halfs, mind you. Thing is, we don`t change the way we play in any sort of way, no matter the opposition, no matter how we toil, how matter the glaring problems we have. As long as we win, somehow, all is fine. But essentially, we walk a thin line every game and only our super-tight defence last season kept us from more bother. The most disappointing thing is, that it is not exactly rocket science to see the problem. If we need a solid defence, yet still have enough attacking power, play e.g. 3-5-2. Balogun - Goldson - Bassey Lundstram Wright - Arfield - Hagi - Kent Morelos - Roofe We have 2 CHs and one DM playing cover these days anyway, so if the opportunity arrises, either Balogun or Bassey can move forward with the other two or Lundstram (Kamara, Jack, doesn`t matter) can cover. Arfield the combatitive MF he tackles back but also runs into attacking spaces vacated by others, Wright, Hagi and Kent rpovide amo for the two strikers, who`s main job is the pester the defenders all game long. But fullbaaaaaaacks. We can more often than not spare the fullback role, as Tav and Barisic are up the park. But if I want wingers, I play wingers (who can easily track back too, if need be ... modern game and all). And Kent and Wright/Bacuna/Patterson will sure, over a time, get into the same stats as Tav or Barisic.