Jump to content

 

 

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/09/21 in all areas

  1. Not sure how the £5m from the share issue will be used but that and I'd hope the Castore/other commercial deals will help ease the burden. I agree it can be argued we're gambling on winning the league but if there wasn't the best selling market for our assets then I understand the quandary. We could have sold say Morelos and Kamara for a combined £20-25m but would we have won the league without them and sold both for less than a better market would realise? The Patterson one was most interesting for me. If there was £10-12m on the table, I'd have possibly taken that as it's uncertain just how much he's going to feature again this season. In general though, I'm not overly worried in a financial sense. I completely agree we need to avoid senseless risks and we need to sell. However, we also need to win the league this season so some speculation is understandable and even if that doesn't happen we still have assets for sale next summer.
    5 points
  2. Just the adornment for the gable ends or garage lintels of the mansions of the rich among us, compo, Craig, Bill, asil. https://rangersfcreadycrests.company.site/ Reduce it to key fob size and stick it on a bit of faux leather and I’d buy it for a tenner.
    4 points
  3. No, the going rate is much more like what the bheasts are charging, £24 a game. That is the most comparable product around and mid-high twenties was where this should have been aimed at. I also dont agree that the crowd size will in any way reflect whether they have got this right or not. They could sell every single ticket, that does not mean they got it right, they are quite morally wrong in over-charging the fans again who have still not been recognised in any way for stumping up £20M last summer for entry to the stadium to watch our league games that we did not get any value for whatsoever. (RTV is simply no compensation for that). All we have got for our collective £20M is an increased price of everything, from tickets to replica strips to the pie stalls. I feel that we are being treated as cash cows and consumers, not as supporters. It is back to the Murray days as far as that goes. I will be paying for my tickets and be cheering on the team as usual. I can afford it and I am a mug. I know that technically I have the option to not pay up and not attend, but in my heart i dont really. If they charged double I would pay it. Doesnt mean it's been priced right or that I dont have the right to moan about it on a forum like this. I feel really sorry for fans that this ridiculously high cost will price out of being able to attend. There clearly is a price for loyalty, our club just double it and add on some and stick it to us, again and again and again.
    3 points
  4. It allows the SNP to exercise control. That’s it I think.
    3 points
  5. over 91% of over 18s have had their first vaccine and over 82% their 2nd , simply do not understand this over reaction by the SNP, they must know the reaction they will get
    3 points
  6. On the face of it, I don't agree. We'll probably make a loss in excess of £10m this season, and I'm not sure how that's to be funded. Perhaps the directors/shareholders will invest further cash, but the impression I had was that they are not investing more. Perhaps there's to be a further large cash injection that we don't know about. However it seems to me that we needed to sell at least one player for £10m+, and I'm surprised that we haven't. Perhaps there's a gamble that we'll win the league again and earn the CL cash next season, but that's a Murray approach to running the club. I have to presume that the directors know what they're doing but we do need additional cash from somewhere.
    3 points
  7. I'm disappointed we've not sold anyone. I can't get passed the fact that we've got a £14M hole to plug this season, we have decent assets to sell, after developing them, and yet we keep retaining them without realising the value. I understand the CL is the holy grail, but if we're spending more and more to get it, is it worth it? I don't think selling an asset precludes us from achieving CL football. We should be selling our assets, using some to plug the financial holes, then re-investing it in new assets to start the process again.
    3 points
  8. In my opinion it is. Lyon charging €60 For 3 games, Celtic charging £75. £500 quid last season to watch RTV (only home games mind), £500 For ST this season, £50 For MyGers, £200 For kids kits, £500 For shares, £50 For two friendlies and now £39 per game in Europe's 2nd tier tournament. Rip off.
    3 points
  9. I can remember when we bumped the price up to six bob ??
    2 points
  10. if you want a peek at the mind set of the club just look at the pre season friendly package on RTV. 30 quid for 5 games. they cancelled one but no partial refund given. you don't even get what you pay for anymore never mind value for money. This is steep no question about it. CL prices.
    2 points
  11. 2 points
  12. More fuss over this than decades of paedophile ring operating inside Separate Entity FC, and decades of covering it up!!
    2 points
  13. People can sing whatever they want. It doesn’t need defending or attacking by me. I have no wish to act like God.
    2 points
  14. The SNP doesn’t aspire to be right, merely to remain visible
    2 points
  15. Not so sure about that. The lionshare of shirt sales goes to the manufacturer. When Messi went to PSG it was revealed that the club got 15% of sales in their Nike contract. So if they sold 1miliion shirts at €50 each they’d only get €7.5m. Not sure what Manchester United’s deal with Adidas is but won’t be too different from PSG’s I wouldn’t think
    2 points
  16. The £4.5m from the share issue will be used to repay Dave King's £5m + interest loan due for repayment next month. The £10m figure I used had already factored in the commercial deals. Remember that we made a £16m loss in the 19/20 season. As I said above, we made a £16m loss in 19/20 season that included qualifying from the group stages of the EL. There were some league games with no crowd but other than any refunded season ticket cash, we would have had most of the cash from them anyway. It'll certainly be interesting to see where the finance comes from.
    2 points
  17. Imagine looking for condemnation of something that might not have actually happened or even worse, something our bitter rivals fabricated. Should we not leave that sort of foolishness to Humza and co?
    1 point
  18. The vaccine numbers are very very high , given they are shutting vaccination Center’s it simply doesn’t square , also they have made a complete dogs dinner , using a Californian company to run the mailing has been nothing short of a shambles , one they have tried very hard to keep quiet .
    1 point
  19. Yeah it's a personal choice but it's one that the club know the vast majority will pay, it's playing on our loyality. Just look at MyGers as an example, the way it's marketed, portraying it as some thing "real fans" would join. However, I'm old enough to remember Rangers playing CL group stage games in front of 30-35,000 fans as the club overpriced the tickets, which was at the time a major embarrassment. There are many fans who have been on furlough, lost the jobs, struggling to make ends meet, but our club just keep bleeding us dry. I'm just awaiting yet another email from Rangers saying I can purchase the EL "Stay at home and watch on the sofa" range of lounge-wear, for just the £100.....
    1 point
  20. I’m not. If you have a point to make, then make it. ?‍♂️
    1 point
  21. I still think those same players will be marketable assets in next season's window, so long as Kamara and Goldson sign extensions.
    1 point
  22. Why are you so keen to put words into the mouths of others?
    1 point
  23. “Even when a vaccine is highly effective, a small percentage of people who are fully vaccinated will get COVID-19 if they are exposed to the virus that causes it,” said West Virginia Epidemiologist Shannon McBee. McBee says, breakthrough cases occur for all vaccine preventable conditions.
    1 point
  24. Was there actually racism? Was this not made up by the press?
    1 point
  25. Thats a fair point and a big difference between the two models. However if the current board are not (as has been suggested) going to continue to fund with soft loans converted to shares, then we are racking up debt somewhere instead surely? Even if it is soft loans to be repaid to the Directors at some point in the future, that is debt.
    1 point
  26. Getting in for the Malmö and Alashkert games was problematic, so I dread to think what the queues will be like with this.
    1 point
  27. the non season ticket mygers members will buy them as it adds to their mygers points does it not
    1 point
  28. Sorry, I should have said, 'No grown man is actually offended by songs.".
    1 point
  29. I thought she who must be obeyed was against vaccine passports
    1 point
  30. I don't think that we did make that much more cash. It's difficult to tell what the net profit was in all years, but it seems like it was around £3.7m in 2004 and £2m in 2006. It's not clear if this was higher than we had got previously and appears lower than the annualised JJB deal that followed.
    1 point
  31. Bacuna would be more like cover for aribo or arfield further forward i think.
    1 point
  32. Yup it's about balancing the price and still selling out.
    1 point
  33. shirt sales with be worth tens if not 100s of millions on ronaldo.
    1 point
  34. It's all about making money and that's what we need ,now it's up to the players to get as far as possible so we can make more money.
    1 point
  35. Missed a trick with the larger one, a couple of pounds more would would have taken it to 169.00.
    1 point
  36. I don't know about having it on the side of the house but I do think this crest is a huge improvement on the lop-sided thing it replaced.
    1 point
  37. I like these. Wonder if MIM were considered for the job?
    1 point
  38. Me?---happy squad hasn't been weakened by selling players under their value and with injuries and suspensions nearly behind us feel that we can now get back to last season's form.
    1 point
  39. Yes, it's definitely a bigger and stronger squad than last season. 'Kinda suggests we should have sold a key asset this summer... *Where's my smug b*st*ard gif...?*
    1 point
  40. There's 25 players named there and we also have Ofaborh, Barker and Defoe who may well play their part. We perhaps don't have a huge amount of key player quality within that 28 man squad but we do have the bulk of the squad that won us the title and qualified from the EL supplemented by Sakala, Bacuna and Lundstram. OK, maybe a Veerman and other striker may have our smiles wider but, generally, we're in a better position than this time last year I'd say.
    1 point
  41. GK: McGregor / McLaughlan / McCrorie LB: Barisic / Bassey CB 1: Helander / Balogun CB 2: Goldson / Simpson RB: Tavernier / Patterson LCM: Kamara / Bacuna DM: Davis / Jack / Kelly(?) RCM: Aribo / Lundstram / Arfield* LAM: Sakala / Kent RAM: Hagi / Wright ST: Morelos / Roofe / Defoe* * Should be phased out. Injured, a lot It's not as overstocked as it appears, IMO. We need two for every position, so the only 'extras', I'd say, are Kelly and Arfield. It's mainly because a few players can play in a variety of positions: Roofe and Aribo in particular.
    1 point
  42. Good points. I can't get past this £14M hole, though... Also, I worry that we'll never cash in: 'We'll just keep our key players over the summer' 'We'll just keep them in January, there's only 6 months to the next main window' 'Maybe we should keep them again and go for the CL?' 'Ah, shit! They're now worthless!' For me, we should always be going for the League and CL, but I don't think cashing in on a key player now and again should necessarily prevent that, if we're reinvesting it prudently - which we've shown we can do. We need to get into the habit of selling, re-investing, and developing players.
    1 point
  43. I can't tell you how to spend your money but I am going to do so anyway. The Europa League matches are all more important than the shares, the replica kits and the friendly matches. The Europa League matches will deliver way more entertainment than the friendly matches. It's not even close.
    1 point
  44. I used 18.5 as that’s the highest possible sale value to work out the potential profit ??
    1 point
  45. Valentine's Day was their last away victory domestically. Their worst start points-wise since 1997/98 First Celtic manager since Mowbray to lose their first OF indeed. But for an unfortunate goal away to Dundee Utd we would be 4 points clear of them, despite our own slow start to the season. As it is, we are 3 clear. What makes for really interesting reading for me is their recruitment policy. Apparently they are close to signing both a winger and a striker.... in fairness, the boy Kyogo looks very tidy (despite Balogun ensuring he had a quiet day yesterday you can tell he is a good player) and Abada will be OK against the other SPFL dross.... but in signing another striker and another winger they are completely ignoring their actual failings.... which are in midfield and defence, particularly in defence. I thought Juranovic did OK for them yesterday and maybe he will play RB instead of Ralston (Ralston is getting plaudits for being an SPFL hammer thrower - he did ok yesterday for them too, but isn't much of a footballer), but Starfelt is a horror show, Welsh will get exposed having to be the cool head beside him, and Joe Hart will undoubtedly cost them points this season. They have, apparently, spent 20 million this season on transfers - when added to last season's spend and given how poorly those transfers have turned out, they must be close to being on their last legs in terms of sellable assets to balance the books. You can only have so many strikers and wingers start... even John Hartson got it spot on yesterday when he said "will Angeball mean Celtic have to score 3 or 4 goals to ensure victories"..... those close games when they are 1-0 up with a few minutes left to play and opponents lump it into the box will be telling, they can't handle the aerial fight. At half-time yesterday, sure they had most of the possession - but a) because Rangers were happy with them having possession in their own half and b) a lot of that possession wasn't dangerous at all. They are easier on the eye than Lennon's Celtic last season... but they are 6 points worse off, after 4 games, I believe. Hardly inspiring. Our expectations are heady, we believe we should win the league. With how we won it at a canter last season, they expected to not put up a fight this season... given their brand of play is better they have bought into the delusion early. For us, we just need to keep focused on one game at a time, winning whether we play poorly or not. We proved yesterday, again, that we have superior tacticians.
    1 point


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.