Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/01/18 in all areas
-
The forum is working brilliantly on my desktop, thanks guys for the advice and comments earlier. I think I will get a new ipad for the house, cant be doing without my Gersnet fix at home!4 points
-
Naismith would be an absolute no-brainer for me. Better than anything we have even at half the player we sold. Can play up front and, just as importantly, can play in the "10" role - in his first stint with us his timing of breaking beyond the strikers reminded me of a young Ian Durrant. Naismith would enhance our first team considerably - I wouldn't even hesitate - couldn't care less what he said back in 2012.4 points
-
4 points
-
Walter Smith said similar but I don't hear the rush to condem him. Back in the day there was a fluid and changing situation where economics mixed with politics and spin. Different people with different interests occupied different roles at different times in what was multi-edged ongoing story that makes War & Peace seem like a prologue. Naismith had his reasons for doing and saying what he did at that point in time. IMO he was a dammed sight more honest than McCoist, who said the right things but laughed all the way to the bank.3 points
-
There was a lot of uncertainty at the time. And as much as it hurt to see someone we lauded say such things, I can at least put myself in their shoes and appreciate why they had doubts or were confused. That said, to come out and do that press conference was poor judgement and I think they were badly advised. If he does come back, I think he would do well do apologise and should he do that, hopefully we might put this to bed and enjoy watching him pull on the light blue shirt again3 points
-
As a technical Philistine, I'm endlessly impressed that there are people out there who know enough about these things to make this change happen so seamlessly. I think you all deserve our thanks and no small amount of envy3 points
-
We lost that in 2012 ,we are where we are and perhaps many of our support need to start realizing neither the team ,club or Scottish football are what they were, even 10 years ago. Cutting our nose off to spite our face is something we just cannot afford at present. If Naismith is half the player he was when he left and willing to play till end of the season for nothing it is a win win for everyone. It allows him to make a ‘gesture’ to the fans and club and to prove his fitness. Then in close season our coaching staff can decide if he is worth a paid contract. I believe if Naismith is anywhere near fully fit he can improve our team he s capable of laying anywhere in the middle or upfront and brings experience having played at the highest level . He can share that experience with the McRorie, Barjonas, Hardie etc of our club ,it can only make them better assets for Rangers going forward.3 points
-
3 points
-
Absolutely agree with this and if we're not going to have to pay any of his wages, or even just a small percentage, its relatively risk free surely?3 points
-
Naismith at half the player he was would be our best by a country mile. At his best he would be the best in the country. Got to be worth a look.3 points
-
Top job for all involved. Thanks for that. And if any donations are needed please PM me, Ive been on here long enough (15 years holt shit) to be welcomed to contribute. I'll have a jar with you.2 points
-
2 points
-
Mate. You could try using tapatalk app on the older iPad. You should be able to find tapatalk in app store. Then once in that app search for Gersnet.See if that improves it and lets you at least use the current iPad2 points
-
I think we have a few players that could have played as backup in our better teams of the past. Is Tav any worse than a Whittiker or Cleland/Bolland? McCrorie looks to have the potential to be a worthy Rangers player but it's early days. Nico at his best would have been good enough for sure, and if our young Morelos stays long enough and improves (as at 21 he is certainly not the finished article yet) then we may have another. The problem is that with the very best quality of player we have in our current squad, this would have been the supplements to our previous squads to add to the quality players we had for these guys to play around. Our poorer players are so far behind the required standard that our overall quality is sadly miles behind other eras.2 points
-
I wish the winter shutdown lasted from November to February. going to the football in the freezing cold and/or pishing rain, slipping and sliding on the streets outside, sitting beside guys who sneeze all over you all afternoon, watching football of a poor quality because the weather is making it harder for the players to play to their best. Now move those fixtures from November - February and put them in June-August, where it is warmer, drier, the pitches are better, you dont need to go with 10 layers of thermals on, (visits to Aberdeen aside!), and watch better quality football as well. It's a no-brainer. If football was starting from scratch today, I am certain our season would be March-October. Sadly, I dont think we will ever embrace this in our backward wee country.2 points
-
Here's the quotes from Naismith: “This is a new company called Sevco. I’ve never met Mr Green or anyone from Sevco. I don’t know who the investors are or what league they’ll be in. So how can I push forward into a new company that I don’t know anything about or any person involved in it? “I have concerns about who is in charge of the new club, definitely. You need to know what business you’re going to be part of. If you don’t, it’s inevitable there will be problems. “The loyalty I had was with Rangers. I’ve never met anyone from Sevco since it’s been formed. And I don’t think I could have moved forward on those terms. “Will I ever come back and support the new club? I haven’t thought about it. Like a lot of Rangers fans, I’m just thinking short-term rather than long-term. Feel free to forgive him. I won't.2 points
-
Gonzo I believe that last guy that didn’t make a mistake in life got crucified,ever since we have all made mistakes. Yes what Naisy did was regrettable but surely everyone in life is allowed at least one mistake? We are surely not so intransigent in our views,or so perfect in everything we have ever done that we cannot give someone a second chance ? What we as a club did to Scot Simon was probably even worse than what Naisy did,and we all forgave the club for its appalling treatment meted out to a man that had dedicated half his life to Rangers. Let ya be open minded and if it does happen and he pulls on tha5 sacred jersey let us all get behind him without any rancour.2 points
-
The only issue would be one of minimum wage, but even if we pay him £20K a year it would be worth it.2 points
-
Hah, either that or 'fools seldom differ'! Rousseau, don't be surprised if Pena is quite keen on a return to Mexico. Whatever his goal to game ration is he's struggled to find a regular starting place, we've struggled to understand and adapt to his 'game' and with Pedro gone his chief supporter has gone. Murty has used him, and used him well at times, but this might be a mutual thing rather than us simply looking to offload him. Pena's biggest problem is one of expectation. The fee paid for him and the stories that followed him created the impression that he was going to be a big, big player. That's not his fault of course. On balance moving him on seems like the wisest course to me.2 points
-
Pena wasn't the all-round midfielder we were expecting, but I really don't see how he was a "flop"; his goal-to-game ratio is superb, and his ability to find space in the box likewise. The narrative is quite clear. I'd rather keep Pena. However, if we're able to recoup the money and put it into a better all-rounder, then so be it.2 points
-
1 point
-
5,000 UK companies used EBT's. Let's see how many of them HMRC go after. I've long suspected it was a rogue element within HMRC which pursued Rangers. Lord a Hodge is not a tax expert. Both tax tribunals(lower tier & upper tier) found in Rangers favour but when this went to common law courts they found otherwise as the judges probably didn't understand tax law and took public opinion into account as well. It will be interesting to see how this develops.1 point
-
I don't think there's anything in that clip if I'm honest. He might just like the smell of his balls or arse.1 point
-
We tried with kranjcar and are still paying for it. Once the legs have gone it is a quick slide down a slippery slope. This, if he is half as good then he is still better is a lot of crap. If he is only half as good as he was then he is finished. He was good but never superman.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Testing a few other wee things tonight so don't worry if you see stuff appear and disappear again...1 point
-
Some people love it. Others hate it. But if it lets you still see Gersnet on this older tablet I'm sure it will grow on you hehe I use it myself tbf1 point
-
Cheers, will try that tonight. Didnt like tapatalk on the phone when I tried it a couple of years ago but it might be perfect for the ipad.1 point
-
I would agree in general but the league has been so unpredictable this season you just never know what a good run could do. And I feel that even before new signings come in this team is capable of mounting a consistent run. Earlier in the season I would have disliked missing weeks of competitive action because the team needed to gel but all things considered this Winter break is beneficial to us.1 point
-
His wages, or a significant portion of them, will be getting covered by insurance.1 point
-
The game against Corinthians is also on Sky Channel 424. Its on Sunday at 4pm1 point
-
I can see why people would have an issue with that bit in bold, but the rest all sounds fair enough from someone who is wondering what's going on and where the next pay cheque is coming from. How old was he at the time, 26? I'm not sure I'd hold that against him, it was maybe naive at best, but do you genuinely think he meant that?1 point
-
first one is midnight Thursday and the second is 6pm Saturday1 point
-
It's a social weakness, this current fashion of rushing to forgive, as if it somehow makes us better people to ignore the misdeeds of others. Naismith panicked and treated the club and its fans like so much shit on his shoe. So fuck him and his latter day conversion. Like other fans, I've been through a storm of shit and disappointment these last six years, too much to suddenly open arms to a deserter like Naismith.1 point
-
The “best squad ever” comment is what caught my attention here. He bullshits like a wrestler in a trash talk showdown.1 point
-
It would be intriguing to get Naismith free of transfer and signing-on fees, and for expenses, rather than wages. I am rarely, if ever, in favour of 'bringing them back', but in this case I might make an exception, if only for the explosion that his return, on terms so advantageous to the Club, would precipaitate at catamite fc, and among its supporters, fellow travellers, acolytes across the media, and other initiates into its spurious cult of sporting integrity ( a moveable feast, if ever I have seen one). i imagine that, even now, hand penned missives, in -naturally- geen ink, and on paper salvaged from the back of sugar bags, will be flying to FIFA, UEFA , SFA, and SPFL, all imploring a full investigation into Naismith's contract, examination of any 'side letter or letters', and declaring that only a determination that his arrangements with the Club are against the governing regulations, and the Laws, and the 'Spirit' of football, contravene the Holy Gospel, and subvert any form of justice, spiritual, natural, or temporal, will be sufficient to assuage the righteous anger of the ordinary football supporter in the street, which person, of course they represent. The more lucid among them will be scouring the highways, byways, and backwaters of the Employment Law, and the minutiae of Player Registration requirements, together with the Law, Regulations, precedents, interpretations, and footnotes, of Taxation, Personal and Corporate, to find some construction, no matter how irrelevant, to prove that 'The Ranjurs' ur 'at it', and 'at it bigtime'. So, "Bring it on!", says I, "I could do with a laugh".1 point
-
Mike, he's earned a whole lot more over his career than Kevin Thomson and I know for fact that KT played for free in both his 2nd and 3rd stints at Hibs - so I suspect that Naismith has plenty set aside for a "rainy day". Plus, he comes across as being a sensible, level-headed, balanced person - so I would hope he hasn't squandered his wealth on ridiculous car licence plates1 point
-
And there is nothing in the article where Naismith says he would play for free for Rangers - it was the words of the media, not Naismith.1 point
-
1 point
-
@Gazza_8 Happy to let you know tapatalk is now back up and running. Search for 'gersnet' and re-add the new forum.(only one that comes up on search) 'Gersnet Forums' Baz1 point
-
Yes, his main reason for coming is gone, so I wouldn't be surprised; which is understandable. If we're recouping the money it's not a bad idea to move him on. (It's most definitely 'fools seldom differ'... )1 point
-
You sneaked that in while I was typing and eating a sandwich at the same time. Great minds think alike as they say.1 point
-
Agreed and an 18 team league should be in place with 2 or 3 divisions max. Although the 18 team league can wait for now to keep Dundee Utd out of the top tier :-)1 point
-
We like to think the community that populated the Rangers Tax Case Blog dissipated, they didn't. They came to detest the bright light shone in their sordid corner. Cosgrove and Spence resent the exposure. The craftier crew decided to fly under the radar and determined to stymie Rangers attempts to climb back to the top. Dembele's proposed multi-million pound move to Brighton allowed a coterie of Sellik minded Journos to call Hove and throw in caveats about the penurious nature of Rangers finances. It will continue until our club Board set up a banking facility that allows an over draft. There was a piece from Pacific Quay CSC member, Chris McLaughlin earlier this season, on the determination of Desmond/Lawwell never to suffer the after math of their Scottish Cup semi-final defeat two seasons past. Dermot did not want to witness strange people in brown brogues celebrating again. Brendan was his weapon of choice. Further, there was an understanding that any Rangers progress would be checked and minimised. Chris did not specify the nature of this operation and I think that's why BBC Scotland quickly pulled the article. Last week, we drew the old firm game at ra Stydome and immediately the usual suspects provided the heavy artillery. Neil Cameron told us that it was the worst old firm game he had ever seen(of course Neil will tell us the second worst one too, won't he), followed by the Referee was the man of the match, and Tom English was concerned the the degree of fatigue threatening Sellik players. Martin Williams then told us not one penny of owed tax had been paid by Rangers, Cosgrove broadcast yesterday on the dilapidation of Ibrox and it's cost of upkeep. Even Spence had the temerity to blame the SFA's failure to secure O'Neill as manager on the SFA acting like the Ibrox Board. If we ever beat ra Sellik, the reaction will be nuclear. Jamie Murphy is a good signing, he improves our team. Thus, lots of analogies reference ginger bottles.1 point
-
1 point